Performing root canal on teeth that already have a crown.

- What happens to the crown? - Working through it vs. removing it. | Can it be reused or does it have to be replaced? - pros, cons, issues and concerns.

the crown.

Link to access cavity photo.


Link to diagram of access made directly through crown.

Root canal therapy is sometimes needed for teeth that have already had a dental crown placed on them. (The statistics on this page document that this is actually a fairly common situation.)

In these cases ... what happens to the crown when the tooth's root canal treatment is performed?

As an answer, we offer this page. Below we explain how the presence of an existing crown is handled, both during and after its tooth's root canal therapy, and what issues might become a problem or concern.

When a crown is involved, the possible scenarios are:

  1. Removing the crown during the treatment process (if possible).
  2. Performing the root canal work through the crown (making the procedure's "access cavity" directly through it).
  3. And then, after the tooth's treatment has been completed, deciding if the crown can be reused or if it must be replaced.

How a tooth's existing crown is managed during its root canal procedure.

The access cavity through which endodontic therapy is performed.

An "access cavity" drilled through a tooth's crown portion gives the dentist entry to its nerve space inside.

In our outline of the steps of root canal therapy, we explain how one of the first steps the dentist takes is creating an access cavity in the tooth. This is the opening through which they'll then perform its root canal work.

In the case where the tooth already has a dental crown, one of the following two scenarios will need to take place:

Option #1 - The dentist will remove the crown before making the access cavity.

When possible, this makes the ideal scenario. That's because:

Making the access cavity probably won't affect the fit of the crown.

The portions of a tooth that are trimmed away to make an access cavity are usually unrelated to those that affect a crown's fit and seal (discussed below).

So, following the tooth's work, the crown can simply be recemented back into place. All of the duties it provided for the tooth prior to its work can still be fulfilled.

Guidelines about restoring root canalled teeth.
Why this scenario may not be possible.

Unfortunately, as simple as this plan sounds, the reality of removing a crown from it's tooth can be quite difficult (or even impossible) to do without damaging it or the tooth (discussed in more detail below).

So in most cases, a dentist will make an attempt at removal but will quickly move on to Option #2 if it doesn't seem to want to come off relatively easily.

Option #2 - The access cavity will be made through the existing crown.

If the dentist determines that the crown won't come off (or at least not easily or predictably), then they'll have to drill the hole (access cavity) right through it to perform the treatment (see picture below).

The access cavity for the tooth's treatment has been made right through the crown.

A dental crown with an access cavity drilled through it.

If a hole is drilled, what's the outcome for the crown?

If this option is chosen, the questions then arise: Has making the access cavity through the crown damaged it? Can it still be used afterward, or will it need to be replaced?

These questions are the subject of the remainder of this page. And as you'll discover, the answer is typically:

  • It may be possible to reuse the crown.
  • But it's probably a better plan to go ahead and replace it.

Discussed below are the types of factors that must be considered when making a decision between these two options.

Evaluating the condition of a crown after an access cavity has been made through it. - Issues and concerns.

A dentist may make the access cavity right through the dental crown.

Drilling an access cavity through an all-ceramic crown will likely weaken it.

1) Is the crown still strong enough to protect its tooth?

If the structural integrity (strength) of the existing crown has been compromised by the act of drilling a hole through it to make the access cavity, and therefore it can no longer be relied upon to protect the tooth (strengthen it, prevent fracture), it will need to be replaced.

Issues that must be considered.

In practice, the degree to which a crown has been weakened by making a hole in it will vary. Here are some of the factors involved:

a) The type of crown.

There are different types of crown construction, and the strength characteristics of each kind will be affected differently when a hole has been drilled through it.

All-metal crowns.

Drilling a hole through an all-metal crown (e.g. gold) probably won't significantly affect its overall strength and the level of protection it provides for its tooth.

Porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns.

Creating an access cavity through a PFM restoration probably won't significantly affect its overall strength characteristics either.

But doing so may affect the integrity of it's porcelain covering (outer shell), possibly resulting in chipping or fracture, especially in the region immediately around the access cavity. (This chipping effect could compromise the integrity of the restoration placed as a repair for the hole, see "filling placement" below.)

More extensive porcelain fracture is possible too. In many cases this may only be a minor cosmetic concern. But if the loss is large enough, it may create a problem with both appearance and function.

All-ceramic crowns.

In comparison to types of crowns that contain metal, the process of creating an access cavity through an all-ceramic ("porcelain") one presents the least predictable outcome.

Concerns about restoration strength and/or damage (such as microcrack formation) that may ultimately lead to failure are valid issues.

  • Just as with PFM crowns, ceramic chipping immediately around the access cavity itself is commonplace.

    (A study by Wood found edge chipping in 100% of ceramic crowns evaluated.)

  • Beyond that issue, the remaining strength characteristics of the perforated ceramic restoration will need to be considered suspect too.

    Logically, the amount of structural integrity that's lost will depend on the type of ceramic and fabrication method used. But unfortunately, the wide variety of techniques in use today make this a difficult subject to create general rules and guidelines about.

Section references - Wood

Our thoughts about the need to replace all-ceramic crowns that have had access cavities made through them.

High-strength dental ceramics.

It would be our interpretation of the articles that we've read that "milled" (monolithic) crowns using newer higher-strength ceramics (like zirconia) may retain the greatest level of strength after their root canal access cavity has been patched. (Bompolaki)

But the use of high-strength ceramics is a relatively new phenomenon in dentistry. And as such, it would be our guess that these types of restorations represent a relatively small percentage of all all-ceramic crowns placed to date and thus not a viable argument for most cases.

Is adequate evaluation even possible?

We'll also mention that it caught our eye that the paper by Wood mentions that: "The visualization of crack formation on access (meaning the making of the access cavity) should assist the clinician in the decision to remake the crown."

Our question would be that on a practical level, how thorough, definitive and predictable can this type of simple visual inspection really be?

Section references - Bompolaki, Wood

b) The extent of the access cavity will be a factor too.

With this issue, it's not just how much of the crown's structure has been trimmed away (an issue that's primarily just a concern with all-ceramic restorations) but also how much internal tooth structure (that supports the restoration) has been removed.

It can be that when the root canal access cavity is created that the tooth is so hollowed out that it no longer provides a solid foundation for its existing crown.

(A study by Heydecke determined that simply filling in this type of extensive hollow space with dental restorative did not restore tooth strength.)

So with these types of cases, a new crown (with a more encompassing design and possibly a post and core) will need to be made.

Section references - Heydecke

2) Can the existing crown be inspected adequately?

Despite both clinical and x-ray evaluation, a dentist's interpretation of the status an existing crown may not be accurate.

  • A study by Abbot examined 245 teeth both before and after their dental crown was removed.
  • Its findings were that 56% of the time tooth decay, cracks or other defects were not detected during the tooth's initial evaluation.

Section references - Abbott

Placing a filling in an access made through a dental crown.

Sealing a crown's access cavity with a filling has both advantages and disadvantages.

3) Can reusing the original crown create an adequate seal for the tooth?

If the structural integrity of the perforated crown seems reasonable, the dentist may simply repair it by way of placing a dental filling (such as a bonded dental amalgam restoration for all-metal crowns or white tooth bonding for ceramic ones).

The benefit.

This solution is a very cost-effective one, in the sense that a repair is made simply and quickly for just the price of a filling as opposed to a new dental crown. However, there are concerns with relying on this type of patch.

The problem.
Coronal leakage - A situation where bacteria seep past a filling.

If the integrity of the filling's seal is lost, bacteria can recontaminate the tooth's root canal system.

The biggest concern when this route is taken is if the patchwork filling can create an adequate seal. One that will help to insure the long-term success of the tooth's root canal therapy by preventing coronal leakage (a process where bacteria and debris seep back into the tooth's root canal space).

This phenomenon is increasingly becoming understood as a significant contributor to root canal treatment failure. If this is the plan for your tooth you owe it to yourself to at least read our linked page above.

What's needed.

To be successful, the integrity of the barrier seal that the filling creates must not only be substantial but also lasting and predictable.

Unfortunately, these characteristics can be difficult to foretell and/or monitor with this type of patchwork situation. If recontamination occurs, root canal retreatment is indicated.

A dental crown provides an excellent seal for a tooth that has had root canal treatment.

Dental crowns are known for creating effective, lasting seals for completed root canal treatment.

Which makes the best choice after root canal, crown patching or replacement?

The alternative to patching an existing crown that's had root canal treatment performed through it is to just go ahead and make a new one. And this solution probably offers the greatest level of predictability and longevity.

If the amount of time, effort and money involved with placing a new restoration are of limited concern (which we admit never are), it seems likely that almost any dentist would consider placing a new crown the superior choice.

It may be possible for your dentist to remove your crown before performing your endodontic treatment.

Removing a tooth's dental crown before its root canal therapy is performed, and then recementing it afterward, can be an excellent plan. However, as ideal as this process sounds the practical application of this approach can be quite taxing, both for the dentist and patient alike.

Advantages of crown removal.

a) The integrity of the crown is preserved.

In the case where the crown can be removed fully intact and undamaged, there's a good chance that it can be permanently recemented after your root canal treatment has been completed. If so, that makes for a very easy and cost-effective solution.

b) Removing the crown aids your dentist's work.

The new shape that a dental crown can give a tooth can mask its original anatomy and orientation, to the point where interpreting the location of the root canals within can be difficult. If so, the dentists efforts to identify and access the canals may result in the removal of excessive amounts of tooth structure or even result in tooth damage.

When the tooth's crown is removed, it lessens the likelihood of these complications.


Taking off a crown prior to root canal treatment is often easier said than done.

Removing a crown from its tooth in a fashion where it remains fully intact and undamaged can be exceedingly difficult, if not impossible. Despite a dentist's best and most careful efforts it's certainly possible that the crown will be ruined.

Different types of crown construction may favor removal. For example, the brittleness of some types of all-ceramic crowns may make the success of this option unlikely whereas with an all-metal one a possibility. However, even the metal aspect of crowns can be damaged beyond repair during this process.

As an added peril, even the tooth itself might be damaged during the removal attempt, possibly even irreparably.

All of this means that while your dentist can be expected to make a try at removing your tooth's restoration, if it doesn't come off easily with their initial efforts they will likely back off on this approach fairly quickly. If so, they will then go ahead and drill an access cavity right through the crown. Then, after the tooth's root canal treatment has been completed, they will evaluate it and its outlook as discussed on this page.



Reason not to reuse crown.

The opening in my existing porcelain metal crown seems small to me. Why can't my dentist just put a white filling in to fill it in and be done with it?


We're not necessarily saying that that can't be an option. But we can say that making a new crown has some advantages.

1) You state that your existing crown is a porcelain metal one (we're assuming you mean porcelain-fused-to-metal or PFM).

To access the interior of your tooth your dentist has had to drill a hole through its porcelain layer. That makes the porcelain inherently unstable and more prone to fracture. Probably in most cases this never becomes an issue but the potential is there.

While only cosmetic in nature, we'll also state that it's unlikely that the color of the filling placed will exactly match your crown. White filling material (dental composite) has some degree of translucency, which means that it will display some of the color of adjacent materials. In this case, it will have a grey tint due to the adjacent metal layer underneath the crown's porcelain surface.

2) The most important reason why a new fully intact crown makes the better choice is because of the seal it is able to create over the tooth (see our discussion above about coronal leakage).

When a filling is used to plug the hole, the quality of the seal it creates for the tooth is difficult to evaluate and monitor.

Probably the best thing that the dentist can do in this case is extend the filling down inside the tooth as far as they can (even down into the openings of the actual root canals). This way the filling's seal is as long as possible, thus creating the most substantial barrier possible.

If the seal is compromised, since your crown has a metal component that covers over the tooth there is no way for the dentist to monitor what's going on inside (like to check for decay) via x-rays.

All and all, predictability of its seal over the tooth is the main advantage that a new crown offers over just plugging the hole in the existing one with a filling.

Filling Material

Tooth #29 has a ceramic crown, with a bridge to #27, so I don't think replacing the crown is an option for me after the root canal. What is the most durable "white tooth bonding" filler material I could use for the access cavity? Thank you!


Clearly this is an issue for your dentist to decide but in general terms:

Dental composite products (white filling materials) are manufactured using different formulations. Some of these are made specifically for applications, like restorations for back teeth, where compressive strength and wear resistance are needed.

So at least at the surface of your crown's opening, they will probably choose a "posterior" dental composite.

What they do inside the tooth is important too. If the filling isn't just all one piece, they'll need to make sure that any base materials underneath the restoration (filling in between the filling and actual tooth structure) have good compressive strength characteristics too, so it is adequately supported.

Part of r/c tool may be left inside tooth toothpain

had root canal 8 months ago then new crown put in tooth has pain if I bite hard or floss in dentist said part of a file might be in the tooth. Sent X-ray to dentist who did the r/c. What now?

Elaine T

If you have a tooth that is still sensitive 8 months out, it should be evaluated.

You mention you have a new crown on the tooth. If something is amiss about the crown's "bite", that could be the cause of the tooth pain/sensitivity you notice.

In regard to having a broken root canal file inside a tooth. Sometimes beyond the dentist's control, root canal files do break. The issue is then if the broken piece (not retrieved, still inside the tooth) has prevented the dentist from being able to adequately complete the goals of endodontic therapy.

Generally a broken file is not a favorable situation and may lead to treatment failure. But only your dentist can determine this.

Tooth # 31 with pain under a crown

My current dentist said I have a r/c problem and need a new crown after they treat this tooth. My old dentist said it might be a broken tooth in there that is causing pain near the gum area. Either way pain is still there for almost a year and I'd like to know if they can put the same crown back in place if the middle tooth to be removed or treated for r/c?


We had trouble interpreting your comments but did notice that you've posted them on this page about reusing a crown after root canal treatment has been performed.

As discussed above, if the crown can't be removed for the root canal work and instead has an "access cavity" made through it, the most predictable/safest choice is to have a new crown made. But, per the arguments discussed above, you and your dentist might decide that patching the crown makes an acceptable alternative.

The other issues you discuss are simply one of diagnosis (which dentist is right about what is wrong). Seeking an evaluation from an endodontist often makes a good choice when difficult cases are involved.

Root Canal with a Crown

After a root canal has been performed that has a crown on the tooth, can I expect some pain and discomfort until the new crown is replaced.


No. Generally that is not correct.

If for some reason the "bite" of the original crown is different than before, then yes that could irritate your tooth. But short of that, the issue of a crown, new or old, would probably have little to do with any near-term postoperative sensitivity you notice.

This page discusses common causes of post-root canal treatment sensitivity.

front tooth root canal

I had a front tooth root canal about 5 months ago. Immediately thereafter my regular dentist said I needed a crown. She also felt that the tooth next to it get a crown. It was done. I noticed that a reoccurring blister still remains as it was before the root canal. I also notice that there is a slight sensitivity on the original root canal tooth. I just received a post card from the dentist that performed the root canal stating that a radiogrphic (x-ray) is necessary to assure that healing has progressed as expected.
What happens next?


We're assuming what you mention about the recurring blister is possibly a fistulous tract. Obviously your dentist will figure that out.

And yes you're right, lingering sensitivity isn't necessarily a good sign about the success of your treatment. (This page discusses common signs and symptoms of failed cases.)

You simply need to appoint with your dentist and let them take x-rays and evaluate your tooth's current status. If a problem is found, the next steps simply depend on the nature of the issue identified. When retreatment seems appropriate, the procedure most often performed is simply repeating the same process as you've had before. Good luck.

Don't need a root canal, just access to fix cavity?

Instead of replacing my crown, my dentist is going to attempt to make an access point through the crown to fix a small cavity tomorrow, then patch it like a chipped tooth. MA won't cover a new crown, but they will cover a filling. She might have to remove the old crown anyway if she runs into issues, but since I have Multiple Myeloma, no money and no income, I'm willing to give it a shot and see if it works for the amount of time I have left.

Anything I should be aware of, or keep an eye out for, if she is successful and doesn't have to remove the old crown?



You don't really mention, so we'll assume that your crown is a porcelain/ceramic one.
The general difficulty associated with patching ceramic crowns is that the crown is a ceramic (glass) but the material used to make the repair is a plastic (dental composite/white filling material).

That offers a few challenges. One is, can a strong enough bond be created between the ceramic and plastic so it will stay in place. Also, the plastic won't have strength characteristics as strong as the ceramic. And finally, the plastic will tend to stain over time, whereas the ceramic will not.

With those difficulties in mind, you should respect your repair for what it is, a patch. You might favor the tooth somewhat, so to protect it from excessive biting or chewing forces.

If you can see the restoration, you might check for signs of deterioration over time (cracks, small bits chipping off at the edges, fracture, dark stain between the restoration and crown). Regular examination by your dentist would be ideal.

crown and core building

40 years ago I broke my front tooth. Recently, the crown and post fell out, because of decay. The decay was repaired and I assume a filling was done on the real tooth under the crown. I've had different dentists suggest implants and bridges. My question is,even tho there is a filling there now, why cant a core building happen to build up the tooth to what it was before and then put back the crown and post, or even a new crown and post?


We don't follow your description entirely but think your situation is:

1) You had a post & core and crown placed 40 years ago.
2) Recently, related to the development of decay, that restoration work fell out.
3) A dentist removed the decay, and then recemented the original post and core.
4) But after that, that dentist stated to you that they thought extraction of the tooth and replacement of the tooth via a bridge or implant was indicated. Other dentists who have seen your tooth have stated the same thing.

One would have to assume that possibly:

1) The decay involved a substantial aspect of the tooth that lies below the gum line. This page explains why subgingival (below the gum line) issues are a problem. (The page is about broken teeth, but the same challenges would apply with tooth structure lost to decay.)

With a front tooth (and the cosmetics involved), changing the level of the gum line might not give an acceptable result.

If the gum line level was changed, possibly due to the extent of the decay the amount of root length still encased in bone would be too short to provide suitable tooth stability.

2) The dentist may feel that what's now left of the tooth offers big challenges in being able to adequately (securely, predictably) anchor a post and core to it.

Whatever decay existed had to lie beyond the edge of the existing crown (decay can't penetrate through a crown). So now that the decay has been removed, it's edges no longer fully lie on sound tooth structure (at least one part would rest on an area of filling).

Structurally that's a weak configuration. And it also means that the existing crown no longer creates a predictable seal over your tooth (the weak link being the fit in the area of the filling). (This page explains some problems associated with dental crowns and tooth decay.)

So even if somehow your tooth is restored with a post & core and crown, all of the components will need to be new ones to do the job right.

Restoration After Root Canal

I had a root canal performed on my #2 molar. I would be OK with only a filling as the tooth is not visible and the repair would be less expensive than a crown.


The issue isn't about appearance. Instead it's (always) about how well the restoration seals the tooth (so to prevent coronal leakage) and possibly a restoration is needed that can strengthen your tooth.

If you haven't already, you should read this page about final restorations for root canalled teeth. (Make sure to read the statistics section.)

Possibly just placing a filling is satisfactory for your situation. But only your dentist can advise you on this issue.

Root canal

I had a root canal treatment a month ago and got the crown fixed i feel pain in my tooth.what should i do?


You need to let your dentist know you are having problems so they can evaluate your tooth.

The problem may be as simple as the bite on the crown isn't quite right and needs to be buffed down. But whatever the problem is, there isn't really anything you can do on your own as a fix. So don't hesitate to contact your dentist.

Add new comment

Comments (especially personal narratives) that don't contribute to the learning/teaching intent of our pages will be deleted. Comments that don't relate to the subject of the page they are posted on especially well will be moved to a more appropriate one, or deleted, after a few days.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Please answer the question so we know you're a human.